![]() Gabrielus de Chiusa (Gabriel Pontifeser Gabriel von Klausen, 1653-1706) ![]() Gabrielus de Chinon (Gabriel de Chinon, d. Gabrielus de Cerignola (Gabriele da Cerignola, ca. Gabrielus de Bullando, see: Gabrielus de Dullandio (further down) Gabrielus de Bambaso (Gabriel Bambaso/Gabriele dal Bambaso, fl. ![]() Gabrielus de Antwerpia (Gabriel d’Anvers/Gabriel van Antwerpen/Charles Tibanti, 1594-1656) Gabrielus Brunus (Gabriele Bruno Veneto, active in the second half 15th century) Gabrielus Bonaventura Preiß (Gabriel Bonaventura, ca. Gabrielus Benclaius (Gabriel Ibn al-Qila’I Ben Kelay Ibn Qila’) Gabrielus Barius/Barrius/Baronus (Gabriele Barrio), author of a life of Joachim of Fiore (1598/1600), and an eulogy on the Latin language, apparently is not a Franciscan friar? Gabrielus Bambaso, see: Gabrielus de Bambaso Gabrielus Angelus Vicensis (Gabriele Angelo da Vicenza, 1712-1776) Gabrielus Angelus de Niceta (Gabriele Angelo da Nizza, fl. Gabriellus ab Ascoli (Felice Gabriele da Ancona, 1603-1684) Gabriellius ab Asculo (Felice Gabriele da Ancona, 17th century) ![]() Gaetano Maria, see: Cajetanus Maria (Letter C) Palabras claves Esfera, filosofia, ontologia, politica, tecnica, tecnologia.Of Maarten van der Heijden and Bert Roest. Sobre el final del articulo se decantan algunas ideas un poco mas definitivas en Sloterdijk: su critica politica como desenmascaramiento de la macroesfera del poder (militar, financiero, periodistico, fiscal), su ofensiva biotecnologica como manifiesto de un quinismo historicamente invisibilizado por el cinismo de elite y, por ultimo, la de la verdad como concepto inesencial a su proyecto psicopolitico. Pero tambien cabe entender su critica, mejor dicho, su proyecto postliberal, como una filosofia posmoderna de la tecnica, cuya clave es la comprension de la tecnologia como destino dentro de la historia del ser. A la par con esto, la filosofia de Sloterdijk se presenta como una nueva ontologia (para decirlo bien, como una ontogenesis del espacio interior), cuyo componente esencial es el principio de informacion. Esta multiplicidad de teorias (esferica, inmunitaria, protesica, antropotecnica, timotica) configura, en los hechos, una misma filosofia animal, que muestra a Sloterdijk como uno de los mas influyentes representantes de la familia nietzscheana. El articulo intenta abordar la asistematica filosofia del pensador aleman Peter Sloterdijk, la 'bestia negra' de la filosofia actual, a partir de la idea de que su nuevo 'gran relato' (entregado fundamentalmente en esa mezcla de filosofia de la historia con filosofia de la tecnica que es Esferas) constituiria en realidad una suerte de coctel de distintas pero cohabitantes filosofias. Keywords Sphere, philosophy, ontology, politics, technique, technology. Finally, some ideas are decided a little more definitive in Sloterdijk: his political criticism as unmasking of the macrosphere of power (military, financial, journalistic, fiscal), his biotechnological offensive as a manifesto of a quinism historically rendered invisible by elite cynicism and, finally, that of the truth as an inessential concept to his psycho-political project. However, it is necessary to understand his critique, rather than his post-liberal project, as a postmodern philosophy of the technique, whose key is the comprehension of the technology as destination inside the history of being. Together with this, the philosophy of Sloterdijk is presented itself as a new ontology (to say it well, as an ontogenesis of the inner space) whose essential component is the principle of information. This multiplicity of theories (spherical, immune, prosthetic, anthropotechnics, timotic) forms, in the facts, the same animal philosophy, which shows to Sloterdijk as one of the most influential representatives of the Nietzschean family. Abstract : The article tries to approach the non-systemic philosophy of the German thinker Peter Sloterdijk, the 'black beast' of current philosophy, from the idea of that his new Big Story (delivered fundamentally in this miscellany of philosophy of the history with philosophy of the technique that is Spheres) would constitute actually a kind of cocktail of different but cohabitants philosophies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |